A Climate For Change

Because climate change is seriously uncool.

UN climate trackers: monitoring for real action

Information

UN climate trackers: monitoring for real action

Join this group to become an UN climate tracker (previously called UN e-monitors), and help ensure the Australian Government plays a constructive role in the UN negotiations that will stop catastrophic climate change.

Location: worldwide
Members: 364
Latest Activity: Nov 19, 2011

How to join the group

To join the group click the + Join UN climate trackers link above the "Members" box on this page.

NOTE: You must be logged in to join the group.

Discussion Forum

Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency 15 Replies

Started by Michael Christie. Last reply by Sue Morrison Jun 13, 2010.

calling all UN Climate trackers 9 Replies

Started by Caroline Nute. Last reply by Rebecca Phyland May 10, 2010.

TAKE ACTION: Join in to break the deadlock at the UN climate negotiations 9 Replies

Started by UN Climate Trackers. Last reply by James Ray Sep 15, 2009.

UN climate trackers blog

Durban climate talks going in to extra time

“We’re back!”

These famous words by the US negotiator a few years ago, shortly after the election of Obama, had a less than positive tone for me this morning walking into the International Conference Centre, venue of this year’s UN Climate Summit.

After four intercessionals (negotiating…

Will final days deliver for the people of Africa?

This year’s UN climate negotiations in Durban are now entering the final stages. Heads of State and Ministers are giving short sharp speeches. Ambassadors and senior diplomats are discussing bottom lines and compromises. Environment groups are following the twists and turns, planning their next moves.

Against the backdrop of the current food crisis in East…

A Pacific Perspective - Clancy Moore speaks to Reverand Tafue Lusama of Tuvalu

Reverend Tafue Lusama knows a thing or two about the urgency to tackle climate change. Living in Tuvalu, he has seen the climate changing over the last twenty years. Rising sea levels, storm surges and ocean acidification have had devastating impacts of people’s culture, livelihoods and ability to grow food. A few…

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of UN climate trackers: monitoring for real action to add comments!

Comment by Shiekh Saleem Banda on October 29, 2011 at 3:16
Climate Justice NOW. A better World is possible if we all hold hands and do the right thing right.
Comment by Cara on August 15, 2011 at 11:26
Thanks for sharing Robin! You can also post videos by going to "My Profile" and the scrolling down to "Videos" where you should see the option to "Add video."
Comment by Robin Pomfret on August 15, 2011 at 11:22

found this interesting vid on carbon capture , but i could not work out how to enter it so i thought i would post it here 

http://vimeo.com/27163710

hope this works 

Comment by Peter Wignall on June 22, 2011 at 11:03

Watching Stephen Hawkin's TV program with his suggestions on "how to preserve the human species," I ask the question: "Is human intelligence unable to rationalise itself to restrict its breeding of humans in order to preserve planet Earth with its Flora and Fauna?

I visited Madagascar in 1972 as a seafarer, looking at today's information on that island I am shocked by the rapid changes that have occurred.

Comment by Gravion.. on May 6, 2011 at 22:03
Global Warming " We are going to combine Suesite"
Comment by Ken Xie on October 1, 2010 at 19:31
I'm not entirely in agreement with Ronnie but there are a number of reasons to favour a carbon tax over an ETS.

First is speed of operationality. A carbon tax could be introduced for the 2011 financial year, whereas an ETS would take at least year to fully design, and if like the EU ETS it had a couple of years of trials before entering into its first phase, that could put off until 2015 or so any real price on carbon. So in the medium term, a carbon tax is more likely to provide certainty and action than a cabon tax.

I agree that up until now, the ETS has been largely ineffective in actually reducing emissions. This is for a number of reasons. Firstly, intensive lobbying resulted in excess permits being given to industry. Secondly, a number of businesses have chosen to offset the emissions by trading permits within the ETS (not a problem) but also by bringing in credits from outside the system via the CDM. This means that they can fulfil their obligations of decreasing emissions whilst real emissions levels actually rise.

The first problem can be resolved via the second commitment period from 2013-2017, so all eyes are on Europe to see if they can hold off the pressure from industry. It will help that they will be auctioning most of the permits. The second problem can only be resolved through coordinated international action, which we aren't quite going to see just yet.

So I must say that I quite like the Greens' proposal of an interim carbon tax providing short-term incentives pending the introduction of an ETS in a couple of years' time. An ETS is not inherently flawed, but it is a much more complex system to set up and a lot can go wrong - not necessarily huge, glaring errors, but the accumulation of little inaccuracies and loopholes can have a cumulatively large impact.
Comment by Michael Salvatico on October 1, 2010 at 15:27
Interesting Ronnie. I would like to hear what has made you feel this way.

Why is a carbon tax any more certain than a market based trading scheme? In reality a tax does not limit the tonnes of carbon emissions at all, it merely put a price on carbon. That price needs to be determined by the regulators. If it is too, low it does nothing to reduce emissions. If it is too high it kills industry before alternative investments can be made. In contrast a carbon market specifies the quantity of carbon emissions and allows the market to determine the price.

This mechanism allowed business to continue in Europe during the Global Financial Crisis. Carbon Emissions were reduced in Europe during the period of the European ETS. Europe is tracking better than required by the 2012 Kyoto targets.
Comment by Ronnie Wright on October 1, 2010 at 10:02
I'm completely opposed to a cap and trade and in favour of a carbon tax. The future of our climate is so uncertain that it is impossible to accurately place a cap on carbon. One only need to look to the EU for an example. Cap and trade has been a total failure there. Time is running out. We can’t rely on a method that has proven to be a failure. See this article.

My hope is that the Greens will have enough power to push cap and trade aside and fight for a carbon tax.
Comment by Caroline Nute on October 1, 2010 at 9:35
More quickly? If it does happen quicker it will be more to do with the additional parliamentary influence of the green and independent electees - although I suspect the support of BHP will help things along a little... lets hope that things get moving and that it is effective!
Comment by Michael Salvatico on October 1, 2010 at 9:29
Who thinks a carbon price is more likely to happen more quickly now that BHP has shown its support?
 

Members (359)

 
 
 

Photos

Loading…
  • Add Photos
  • View All

Badge

Loading…

© 2012   Created by Grant Hill.   Powered by .

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service